Just finished reading Oliver Sacks latest- The Mind's Eye. It is shorter and more personal than some of his other books: one whole chapter is entirely about his own experience with losing vision in one eye. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but I'm a nerd. Makes me want to write to him and ask about my own head. Maybe the fact that I don't visualize much of what I read is that my reading is so visual instead of oral? By that I mean that I concentrate on the look of the words on the page rather than speaking them to myself as I read. I do not have a photographic memory, but- without consciously trying to commit this to memory- I remembered a word's approximate location on the page and the shape of the word when I later decided to go back to find the word and look it up. (If my memory were photographic, I could scan my page in memory to find the word I wanted to look up!) I can't hold an image in memory for very long, and I can't focus in on it- I can recognize people in my "mind's eye", but if I try to examine them more closely or look for more detail my image kind of 'falls apart', even with people I know very well, like my family. I can draw, but I have to have an object to draw in front of me. I cannot hold a realistic image in my mind and draw from it. Sign language is a visual language and to describe location and spatial relationships with sign language, you have to have a visual image of them yourself, which I rarely do. If I were describing my own living room I imagine I would have a general image, but interpreting for others requires one to place people and object in various places in your signing space so that you can refer to them, and I have a harder time keeping straight where they are, because I have no actual visual construct....
ANYWAY, Oliver Sacks books always make me think about thinking. Won't it be amazing when we have all the answers about how our minds work?!
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Lynness- Oliver Sacks
Posted by Abby at 1:26 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment