Saturday, September 12, 2009

To Keep Reading...

I just read Push, a Novel by Sapphire. There is a movie coming out based on the book, I saw the trailer and I was intrigued. The story is of a young girl who is molested both by her mother and father, gives birth to two children by her father before she is 17, is failed by the school system, police, and welfare systems. Its just a sad story that makes you mad to think that THIS COULD BE happening…It is not really a GREAT read, or something that I would recommend.

I was introduced to The Secret by Rhonda Byrne YEARS ago, but it seemed to be against what I believed as to where our focus should be. I was introduced to it again this year with a religious focus and I read it. I really enjoyed the read. Reading it with the mind set of religion, following the commandments, prayer, “righteous living” it was nice to have a refresher of my mind set. I found myself thinking positive. “All things are possible through him that strengthens me” I know this book is not for everyone but I really enjoyed it and would actually love to revisit the book!!

I have set a new goal to read 1 book every 2 weeks… I guess I will keep my fingers crossed LOL!! Happy reading to everyone!!

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Abby: Yes, definitely

Well even though Rae will be busy in her new calling, I'd love it if we all still stop in here when we can to share what we've been reading. :) I'm with Lulu.

I just started Catching Fire (Suzanne Collins) last night and am restraining myself from losing myself completely in the book! Hunger Games is the first book if you're interested in these.

Lulu, I would love to borrow The Graveyard Book when I come visit you soon (especially since I already read the first chapter while I was at your house...tee hee).

Oh! I am also reading Eat This, Not That: Supermarket Survival Guide (talks about the ingredients of several popular brands and goes on to explain what the ingredients do and why you should "eat this" (i.e. "Smart Balance") and "not that" (i.e. "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter") and You Are What You Eat. (This is from BBC America's Dr. Gillian McKeith who hosts the show of the same name.)

I've also started and am slowly working my way through:
Young Bucks by Troy Dunn (about teaching kids to earn money and manage it)
Running With Angels by Pamela Hansen (about losing weight, battling depression, and running a marathon)

And sitting on my shelf, waiting its turn:
In Defense of Food
Eat This, Not That: For Kids

What is everyone else reading? And have any of you read the books I'm reading? Hope you're all doing well in your own busy things. :) I know I am!

Lulu: Yes, please

Yes, Rae, I myself do want to continue this book blog.

Lately, I've read and loved The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman.

Huh. I thought I had more to list. Apparently the previous books I read were not too memorable.

Raehink: Hiatus

Until further notice, I will be on a hiatus due to a possibly demanding calling. Please continue to post about books you have enjoyed and would like to recommend. In time, I will be back. If we still want to continue this book club. Love to all and as always...


Happy reading!

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Raehink: August Reading

I hope everyone enjoyed the month of July, whether you read something patriotic or not. I thoroughly enjoyed reading about John and Abigail Adams. My book group read a novel by Irving Stone, but I read a nonfiction account of their marriage. I came away with even more respect for our founding fathers, but especially our founding mothers who led a supportive and quieter role in the background. Abigail was an amazing woman!


Your assignment for the month of August is to find a royal read...anything (fiction or non, your choice) having to do with royal personages i.e. kings, queens, princes and princesses. It doesn't matter which country you choose as a setting, either. It does seem that most royal historical books are set in England or France, though. Take a trip to your local library if you need some assistance. There are plenty of books out there waiting just for you!

Here are some authors that are known for writing about the English royals: Philippa Gregory, Jean Plaidy (who is also Philippa Carr and Victoria Holt), Margaret George, Antonia Fraser, and Alison Weir. Carolyn Meyer and Kathryn Lasky have both written in the "Royal Diaries" series for younger readers. If you'd like a mystery set during a particular royal period of time, try Fiona Buckley, Karen Harper, or Patricia Finney.

I picked up three titles at the library: Jean Plaidy's The Lady in the Tower (about Anne Boleyn) and In the Shadow of the Crown (about Mary, daughter of Henry VIII and Katherine of Aragon) and Philippa Gregory's The Constant Princess (also about Katherine of Aragon). I'll let you know which one I chose at the end of the month.

Happy reading!

Monday, July 6, 2009

Raehink: Regarding Common Sense

I'm excited that you are reading Paine's "pamphlet" to the colonists. In my reading about John and Abigail Adams, I discovered that John reacted negatively to Common Sense and even wrote a response to it that was published in newspapers. It's intriguing that those founding men didn't always agree on these heady issues, and yet they were able to pull it all together in a way that was ultimately inspired. I think our current senators and representatives have entirely forgotten how to do that! They could benefit from some early history. I look forward to your commonsensical comments.


Good luck on the house and baby. I love the name Tabitha, by the way. And it's particularly colonial!

Happy reading!

Lynness- Common Sense

I've decided I'm going to try Common Sense, by Thomas Paine.  I googled "patriotic reading list" and found one that included some pretty hefty titles.  I figured I had time for this one.  I also decided that I'm going to make comments as I go, instead of at the end, since we're about to get really busy (we think we'll have a contract on our house by the end of the day, and I've got about 3 weeks until Tabitha makes her debut...).  That way I get SOMETHING posted, even if I don't get to finish it.

The first section of his treatise is on the origin and design of government.  Here's a quote:
“...Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest...” (underlining by me)

That's the zinger- we elect someone (and I'm not talking about anyone- president, senator, etc. in particular) or vote for some measure that we think will bring about needed change, only to find that we've created a monster that we now have to live with.  We make laws to address issues which down the road create bigger concerns- and all this we have visited upon ourselves.
I find it interesting- and correct- that he compares the need for government to a fallen state.  I think of the Millennium and wonder how wonderfully different it will be when Christ reigns personally on the earth.  Millennial peace will be possible because the grossest wickedness will have been destroyed at Christ's 2nd coming.  Certainly in the Celestial kingdom, if not in Zion on earth in the Millennium, we will need no government of the type man creates, for we will be better governed by ourselves.

On another note...wouldn't it be nice if everyone in a government position (and all of us who elect our leaders) remembered this line?
“I draw my idea of the form of government from a principle in nature which no art can overturn, viz. that the more simple any thing is, the less liable it is to be disordered, and the easier repaired when disordered;” (underlining by me)
In a time when bureaucracy and red tape and delay and complication are synonymous with government and the whole organization is so complex that I don't believe anyone quite understands all the ramifications of any changes implemented, since they affect so many other things, how are we even supposed to begin reform?

That's enough for now!